I was travelling last week (to Berkeley then Sonoma, and yes it was very
nice except my first ever time in Oakland saw the rental car's passenger
window get smashed while the car was parked in broad daylight on a major
thoroughfare in front of the coffee shop in which Anne and I were having
coffee) and I was a little bored with the book I had started—which I
have subsequently finished and will be #28—and the first of four new
novellas in the "Old Man's War" series was to be released on what was
then the next—but is now this past Tuesday—so I decided to indulge
in a little lightning re-read to prepare myself.
My relationship with the military is not entirely usual, in that I never
served, but for as long as I can remember, my father was in the USAF, so
I had a lot of contact with it growing up.
Even while knowing it wasn't for me—I am probably not meant for an
organization where shouting at your superiors might get you thrown in
jail or shot—I have a lot of respect for it as a calling, and I am as
clear as I think a lifelong civilian could be about the sacrifices that
it involves…which is, I think, a large part of why I look with utter,
complete disdain for people who gin up talk about military solutions to
world problems (e.g. Republicans).
At the same time, I could also write a long apologia for Starship
Troopers, which I don't actually regard as a particularly militaristic
novel—I think it's far more interesting in its views on the necessity
of participation in a civil society. But as much as anything, I suspect
that viewpoint is grounded in my exposure in my youth to the actual
military.
Which obviously brings us to Old Man's War and its follow-ons.
Scalzi is a contemporary, and I think that's a large part of why his
writing feels very natural to me—we speak in a similar vocabulary of
layers of irony and snark over often heartfelt convictions. If it's easy
to read, it's also fairly economical—unlike, say, Neal Stephenson, I
can blow through a whole novel in a few hours, no problem.
I will say that on this time through, I did notice more places than I
remembered where certain phrases clanged—not that they were wrong
per se, just that they felt awkward, or that there might have been a
better word.
Regardless, all five novels are entertaining, and if there's
occasionally a certain breeziness to them, well, I'm not going to
complain—I expect Scalzi to deliver something that has an entertaining
diversity characters and a good story; if I want something heavier, I
know where to look.